Stop Thinking Chatbot, Start Thinking Systems
How to Think Creatively About Generative AI Applications in Your Organization
Most decision-makers hear "generative AI" and immediately think "chatbot" — something that answers questions, maintains conversations, maybe drafts emails sometimes. This misses the bigger story. The real power of generative AI is in transforming your existing content formats into living, intelligent systems that scale your expertise from in-person workshops to organization-wide impact.
On the other side of the coin, your content specialists are dedicating precious hours or even days to crafting compelling material. It lands in some inboxes, gets skimmed by someone important, and disappears into digital filing cabinets forever. Even when it does make an impact, your best thinking reaches only a fraction of the people who could benefit from it, and then you're off searching for the next insight that will garner the attention you seek.
The breakthrough happens when you stop thinking of AI as a separate conversational tool and start embedding its generative power directly into the content formats your specialists already create. This manifests not as another interface to chat with, but as original generative tools that assume the format of documents, assessments, and knowledge systems that already drive your business.
Here are three formats that illustrate this shift — from static artifacts to intelligent systems. They might not be the perfect fit for your specific context, but they will help prime your thinking on innovative ways to unlock the potential lying dormant in your shelved data repository.
Forms:
Traditional forms collect information. AI-powered forms embody assessment professionals. Instead of static questions that treat every respondent identically, these systems function like a panel of specialists. They collaboratively designing questions based on accumulated experience applied in real-time to emerging insights. Where a single expert assessor might evaluate dozens of cases per year, these intelligent forms can deliver that same quality of personalized evaluation to hundreds of people simultaneously.
Generative AI's greatest power — creating new ideas — becomes a facilitator in the data acquisition process. The system prevents institutional amnesia by recognizing when to explore deeper, drawing parallels with past cases and generating evaluation questions to drill deeper when it detects a digital "hunch." This isn't just digitizing your assessment process; it's transforming dead forms into living expertise.
This allows the tools to facilitate paths out of contradiction. Rather than forcing decision-makers to reconcile conflicting findings manually, these forms can create coherent frameworks that highlight consensus areas and surface critical disagreements. Follow-up questions automatically address identified pain points or discrepancies, transforming friction into clarity.
We built an AI-powered tough conversation navigator tool called Sisu to showcase how this would look in practice. Users describe a challenging conversation they're facing, and the system generates tailored inquiries based on personality dynamics, relationship context, and emerging patterns in their responses. The result is a tool that functions more like consulting with a skilled relationship coach than filling out a paper-and-pencil form.
https://www.sisu.is/
Reports:
We are stuck in an outdated paradigm where content delivered on screen behaves like something printed on paper. AI-powered reports beckon us to grow out of this pattern, because these same reports can now become dynamic thinking tools that evolve with organizational needs rather than collecting digital dust. Your reports shouldn't just inform — they should think alongside your readers.
These systems embody the methodological DNA that makes your frameworks successful. Recipients can extend your logic, philosophy, and ideation processes to contexts of particular interest, creating a renewable resource out of your strategic thinking methodology. Your strategic insights, which might previously influence the thinking of the executive team who attended your presentation, can now shape decision-making at every level of the organization.
The real power emerges when these systems can access your entire knowledge capital, connecting relevant material to whatever issue captures the client's attention in the moment. This creates contextual relevance that human analysis could never achieve at such scale.
Most organizations that take pride in their content are apprehensive about trusting generative AI to represent their refined approaches. This is an understandable sentiment, given all the AI slop that is flooding the internet. When done properly, however, the results can be genuinely eye-opening — preserving the nuance that makes your methodology invaluable while expanding the horizon of what it can do.
We demonstrated this potential with "Leaders Make the Future: Infinite Edition," an experimental extension of a leadership book I recently published in collaboration with IFTF distinguished fellow Bob Johansen. The platform uses the book content as a springboard to generate entirely new chapters on topics of the user's choosing. Each generated page preserves the book's philosophical approach and strategic frameworks while venturing into territory the original authors never explicitly covered, creating a living resource that grows with reader needs.
https://www.infinite-leadership.com/article
Wikis:
Traditional planning documents force you to pick one scenario and invest all your human effort into seeing that model through. AI-powered wikis let you architect multiple coherent scenarios simultaneously, each internally consistent with the others while exploring different possibilities. The strategic thinking that once remained confined to the planning team can now engage hundreds of contributors across your organization. Knowledge bases should generate knowledge, not just store it.
Think of it as building parallel worlds of strategic thinking. Users can explore how decisions might play out under different conditions, riding the ripple effect in an exhilarating and perpetually original discovery journey.
Instead of every user generating content in isolation like they would in a chat thread, every new input reveals new territory about an internally consistent world. Insights from one scenario automatically inform the others, creating cross-pollination of ideas that amplifies creative problem-solving. The result is a sort of collective world-building.
We have effectively fostered such a community effort in a future forecasting wiki called WhatIfPedia. Users search for any topic—"sustainable transportation," "remote work culture," "urban farming"—and the system generates Wikipedia-style articles describing how that subject might evolve over the next decade. We also put a twist on the framework by embedding links into the generated text; clicking those links creates entirely new pages that maintain consistency with the page you left and all the other content on the platform. What emerges is a shared speculative universe where hundreds of users collectively build a coherent vision of 2035.
The most fascinating aspect is watching the world gain specificity through exploration. Early pages might describe broad trends, but as more users dig into details—local regulations, cultural shifts, technological bottlenecks—the future becomes increasingly vivid and nuanced. Each person's interests add texture to scenarios that started as skeletal frameworks, creating futures rich enough to feel genuinely plausible.
https://www.whatifpedia.org/
The organizations that will thrive in the AI era won't be those with the most sophisticated chatbot, but those that recognize intelligence has become a medium like clay or paint. When your forms think, your reports evolve, and your knowledge bases actively contribute to problem-solving, you're not just using AI — you're offering institutional intelligence as a deliverable. The strangest outcome of the intelligence revolution may be that thinking becomes agriculture: renewable, scalable, and mysteriously abundant.
Really interesting! I will try to think this way in the new projects and would love to discuss this at some point. thanks for sharing!